"the domino prototype... has haunted architectural imagination ever since"
- deyan sudjic
hmm. very vague now. dunno how to "ask the correct question" to tackle this academic mess.
there is a basic assumption underlying this dissertation. that is, mass produced single family houses in singapore follows a basic nLKD (n living rooms, kitchen, dining) hierachy. it has greater impacts on psf pricing rather than addressing the live in conditions of the occupants.
basically i am questioning the historical consequence of the tradition of single family house. why in plan, the 21st century house is ideologically exact to the 18th century tudor house.
uma and prof heng cited that due to customs, family traditions and makeups, societal wants and needs, the mass produced single family house will not change. khengsoon haven meet me, but i hugely suspect he is gg to berate me on the vagueness of tot.
anyways, my point of contention is, there is huge possibilities for a niche housing/house. current types of SOHO, studio apartments, white flats fall short. i am steering clear of populist and utopian visions (or technocratic pessimist ones) and grinding into the facts.
a house. the generic type. is now reduced into a symbol, a harking back to the 18th century bourgeosie domestic fantasy which can never be attained. the family, work, societal, technological, consumer spaces dominating a house has greatly altered the architectural one. so much so there are inherent tensions trying to live out the ideology within the concretised walls of the floor plans.
here, i am not trying to provide an ideology free dream house. i am trying to find facts to address the fact that new ideas should in fact guide house design better rather than a continual pessimistic tone to the usual Death of Public Space, Death of the Workplace, Fall of the Public Man, the Uncanny Home, the Island/Matrix/I Robot/1984 technocratic domination literature. eg families are not torn apart by internet, but indeed more connected. poor stereotyping of children and elderly. workplaces become more homely more so than homes become looking more like offices. family roles after the end of Patriarchism. consumerist furniture and interior design that puts architecture into the pale, etc.
neither is this a corbusien/archigram styled alternative manfesto for society wide implementation. i am trying to compartmentalise the dissertation into the design of A HOUSE.
a house, that hopefully addresses the real needs of pple who desire to live a certain way customisable within another hypothetical framework rather than the current paradigm.
can you guys ask me the correct question?